<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God&#8217;s Number and the Rubik&#8217;s Cube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaellivingston.com/gods-number-and-the-rubiks-cube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaellivingston.com/gods-number-and-the-rubiks-cube/</link>
	<description>Professor, Writer, Editor, Occasional Adventurer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.michaellivingston.com/gods-number-and-the-rubiks-cube/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellivingston.com/gods-number-and-the-rubiks-cube/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>So the tootsie-pop company actually has info on the whole tootsie-pop-lick question.  Problem is due to human factors (such as saliva, tongue size, time of each lick/time tongue touches said pop, etc) there are no consistant results.  I personally agree with the owl...and bite the darn thing.

As for the Rubik&#039;s cube there is amazing research done on that little toy.  There were even classes taught on how to solve it at some of the top engineering/science schools when it first came out.  The toy is just one giant mathmatical equation.  I actually know several people that can solve it in the proposed minimal solution every time...I need my cheat-sheet to do it.

I think the words you are looking for right now are nerdy-dork! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the tootsie-pop company actually has info on the whole tootsie-pop-lick question.  Problem is due to human factors (such as saliva, tongue size, time of each lick/time tongue touches said pop, etc) there are no consistant results.  I personally agree with the owl&#8230;and bite the darn thing.</p>
<p>As for the Rubik&#8217;s cube there is amazing research done on that little toy.  There were even classes taught on how to solve it at some of the top engineering/science schools when it first came out.  The toy is just one giant mathmatical equation.  I actually know several people that can solve it in the proposed minimal solution every time&#8230;I need my cheat-sheet to do it.</p>
<p>I think the words you are looking for right now are nerdy-dork! <img src='http://www.michaellivingston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

