<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Whole-paper Grading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaellivingston.com/in-defense-of-whole-paper-grading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaellivingston.com/in-defense-of-whole-paper-grading/</link>
	<description>Professor, Writer, Editor, Occasional Adventurer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Livingston</title>
		<link>http://www.michaellivingston.com/in-defense-of-whole-paper-grading/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellivingston.com/?p=739#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>Well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. E. Bollinger</title>
		<link>http://www.michaellivingston.com/in-defense-of-whole-paper-grading/comment-page-1/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>C. E. Bollinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellivingston.com/?p=739#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>For over three decades, I&#039;ve made a good living off the fact that most college graduates can&#039;t write their way out of a paper bag. The concept of thesis-argument-citation-conclusion appears to be beyond the reach of the vast majority of working scientists, computer-related specialists, and health and pharmaceutical professionals. 

I&#039;m not kidding. Many of them think that if they deeply bury their writing in jargon, the lack of substance in their work will be overlooked. I used to be very glad of this, because it meant I would always have a job. :)

However, I&#039;m not doing that work anymore, so I think it is a very good thing for all professors to hammer all aspects of good writing into the brains of their students. In whatever profession those students pursue, their abilities to write clearly will quickly elevate them above their peers. 

In summary, it is never a bad thing to be confident about your ability to write coherently and persuasively. Anything that professors can do to help their students grasp this Fact of Life will improve their futures considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For over three decades, I&#8217;ve made a good living off the fact that most college graduates can&#8217;t write their way out of a paper bag. The concept of thesis-argument-citation-conclusion appears to be beyond the reach of the vast majority of working scientists, computer-related specialists, and health and pharmaceutical professionals. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not kidding. Many of them think that if they deeply bury their writing in jargon, the lack of substance in their work will be overlooked. I used to be very glad of this, because it meant I would always have a job. <img src='http://www.michaellivingston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m not doing that work anymore, so I think it is a very good thing for all professors to hammer all aspects of good writing into the brains of their students. In whatever profession those students pursue, their abilities to write clearly will quickly elevate them above their peers. </p>
<p>In summary, it is never a bad thing to be confident about your ability to write coherently and persuasively. Anything that professors can do to help their students grasp this Fact of Life will improve their futures considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

